Stay in the know
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs
Why law firms need to respond to new and disruptive technologies
For law firms, investing in AI technologies seems an obvious strategy. But the technology is a means to an end. Clients won't pay for AI investments but they do want their legal providers to take a lead in offering progressive services and solutions to recast the value gleaned from their relationships.
AI technologies, especially machine learning and natural-language processing, are already impacting the legal sector. Whilst nobody claims that AI will replace the role of lawyers any time soon, a 2016 report1 by The Boston Consulting Group predicts that technological solutions could perform up to 50% of the tasks currently carried out by junior lawyers. Just as other industries have been disrupted by digitalisation and smart technology, the business model of a law firm suggests that, combined with a fragmented industry and pressures on legal process management, AI will have a large effect on future legal practice.
However, the argument is not necessarily so straightforward. Law firms themselves need to ask why their clients would want them to begin offering legal services supported by a suite of AI tools. They need to take charge of creating the right mix of human and machine capabilities to re-cast future relationships that benefit both provider and client.
What is the client perspective?
Our research suggests that clients have strong and varied views on why their private practice firms need to respond to new and potentially disruptive technologies. We have grouped these views into three distinct areas:
Download your copy of the report here
1 http://www.bucerius-education.de/ fileadmin/content/pdf/studies_publications/ Legal_Tech_Report_2016.pdf
The contents of this publication are for reference purposes only and may not be current as at the date of accessing this publication. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action based on this publication.
© Herbert Smith Freehills 2024
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs