Stay in the know
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has made important changes to the requirements for new and current applicants for a ‘full’ Australian financial services license (AFSL) and a ‘foreign’ AFSL. By updating Information Sheet 240 (INFO 240), Regulatory Guide 105 (RG 105), and its licensing kit in Regulatory Guides 1 to 3 (RG 1, RG 2, and RG 3), ASIC has:
As noted in our article of 28 February 2020, under recent changes to the Corporations Act, ASIC must satisfy itself that AFSL applicants pass a new “fit and proper person” test in relation to its officers and controllers (and officers of controllers where the controller is a company). The test also applies to ‘senior managers’ in the case of applicants or controllers that are organised as trusts or partnerships.
So far ASIC has been administering the new test by requiring all relevant persons to provide certain “People Proofs”, being a national criminal history check, a bankruptcy check and a tailored 17-question ‘Statement of Personal Information’ questionnaire.
As a concession apparently directed at the practical difficulties posed for large corporate groups, ASIC has updated INFO 240, so that certain persons can be certified as fit and proper by the applicant without the need to provide the “People Proofs”. However the certification option is not available for officers of the applicant, for officers of an ultimate holding company or for controllers who are natural persons.
Importantly, ASIC has reserved its position on permitting fit and proper certifications, and may subsequently request applicants to provide “People Proofs” or other additional information.
The certification option will be welcomed by a range of applicants, particularly large corporate groups with layers of controlling companies between the applicant and the ultimate parent company.
An applicant who seeks to take advantage of the certification process will need to:
both of which we can assist with.
Applicants will need to take particular care in identifying relevant “officers” given the subjective nature of the definition. As well as appointed directors and secretaries, “officer” includes a person:
The original INFO 240 introduced a requirement to provide non-core proofs for specified requested full AFSL authorisations at the time of the lodgement of the application (instead of when and if requested by ASIC subsequently).
ASIC has now reduced the number of circumstances in which non-core proofs are required at lodgment. For example, full AFSL applicants who seek a derivatives or foreign exchange contract authorisation are no longer required to provide the following non-core proofs at lodgement:
ASIC may still require these applicants to provide these non-core proofs at a later stage in the process upon request.
Through a series of amendments to RG 1, RG 2, and RG 3, ASIC has provided guidance on how it will administer the foreign AFSL application process.
Importantly:
The contents of this publication are for reference purposes only and may not be current as at the date of accessing this publication. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action based on this publication.
© Herbert Smith Freehills 2024
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs