Follow us


In 2024, the Australian sanctions landscape continued to evolve, underscoring foreign policy initiatives to address global security threats through targeted financial and trade restrictions. In particular, 2024 saw the continued expansion of intensified sanctions measures against Russian entities and individuals, particularly those involved in human rights abuses, corruption, and cybercrime, as well as new measures targeting North Korean arms suppliers to Russia.

Alongside these developments, a number of Federal Court cases clarified key aspects of the Australian sanctions framework, offering critical guidance on sanctioned dealings and supply prohibitions, and influencing policy.

A review of Australia’s sanctions framework by the Australian Government also explored potential sanctions reforms aimed at enhancing the effectiveness, clarity, and humanitarian considerations of Australia’s sanctions laws.

As we close out the first quarter of 2025, scrutiny of Australia’s sanctions framework continues. In particular, multiple Parliamentary Committee reviews have released reports outlining recommendations for ongoing reform to the Australian sanctions landscape. Additionally, the Australian Sanctions Office (ASO) has released a suite of guidance and advisory notes to assist Australians and Australian businesses to comply with aspects of Australian sanctions laws.

These continuing developments underscore the importance for companies to remain alert to legal change and have robust sanctions compliance frameworks that equip their business to respond.

This article brings together the key sanctions updates for 2024 and outlines developments as we look ahead through 2025.

The key sanctions developments in 2024 included:

  • Further targeted financial sanctions and travel bans on Russian individuals and entities, particularly those complicit in corruption, human rights violations and cyber-crime.
  • Targeted financial sanctions on further entities associated with North Korea’s supply of arms and related matériel to Russia, in violation of UNSC resolutions. Australia has joined international partners (including the UK, US, New Zealand and others) to establish a state-led sanctions monitoring team to monitor and highlight North Korea’s sanctions non-compliance.
  • Multiple uses of Australia’s autonomous cyber sanctions framework to impose targeted financial sanctions and travel bans, including against individuals involved in the cyber breach of Medibank Private and those involved in ransomware and cybercrime groups (such as LockBit and Evil Corp). The use of these sanctions is part of an ongoing coordinated international law enforcement effort against cybercrime. See HSF’s detailed update on this here.
  • The imposition of a broad range of other sanctions regimes, including targeted sanctions on entities linked to the Myanmar military regime, targeted sanctions against Iranian individuals and entities in response to Iran’s missile program and human rights violations, Magnitsky-style sanctions against Israeli individuals for involvement in violence in the West Bank, and counter-terrorism financing sanctions against individuals and entities linked to Hamas, Hizballah and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. See HSF’s detailed update on some of these developments here.
  • In a landmark case, the Federal Court directly considered the scope of the Australian Sanctions Regulations 2011 (Cth), marking the first instance where an Australian court has interpreted the prohibitions on sanctioned supplies (regulations 4 and 12) and dealings with designated persons and entities (regulation 14): see Alumina and Bauxite Company Ltd v Queensland Alumina Ltd [2024] FCA 43. On 8 November 2024, the Full Court dismissed an appeal from this decision: see Alumina and Bauxite Company Ltd v Queensland Alumina Ltd [2024] FCAFC 142. See HSF’s detailed case notes on these decisions here and here. An application for special leave to appeal to the High Court was filed in relation to this decision but, in March 2025, the High Court refused to grant leave to appeal on the basis the proposed appeal was not an appropriate vehicle to consider the questions raised, did not raise any point of general principle, and there was insufficient reason to doubt the correctness of the Full Court’s decision: see Alumina and Bauxite Company Ltd v Queensland Alumina Ltd [2025] HCADisp 51.
  • The Federal Court also considered the interpretation of the word ‘transport’ in relation to import sanctioned goods prohibitions (regulation 4A): see Tigers Realm Coal Limited v Commonwealth of Australia [2024] FCA 340. See HSF’s detailed case note on this decision here.
  • On 8 April 2024, an amendment to the Autonomous Sanctions Act 2011 (Cth) was introduced in response to two further decisions of the Federal Court to confirm individuals and/or entities can be validly sanctioned on the basis of past conduct or status, or with respect to past circumstances: see Alexander Abramov v Minister for Foreign Affairs (No. 2) [2023] FCA 1099 and Deripaska v Minister for Foreign Affairs [2024] FCA 62. See HSF’s detailed case notes on these decisions here.
  • There were also a number of changes to general permits issued by the ASO, including replacing the Intellectual Property Rights General Permit which expired on 25 May 2024 (in August 2024) and making some substantive changes to the scope of the Legal Services General Permit (in October 2024). See HSF’s detailed update on this here.

Developments in 2025

As we move further into 2025, we expect ongoing developments to the Australian sanctions landscape, including as follows:

  • We expect to see further sanctions measures to be implemented in response to the situations in Ukraine, Iran and the West Bank. Consistent with this, in February 2025, the Minister for Foreign Affairs announced a further suite of targeted financial sanctions and travel bans on designated persons and entities associated with Russia’s illegal administrations in eastern Ukraine and Crimea, including ministers, judges, prosecutors and individuals responsible for violence and forced deportation of Ukrainian children. Many of these persons and entities were already the subject of US, UK and EU sanctions. These sanctions measures also targeted persons and entities involved in deepening military cooperation between Russia and North Korea. Additionally, the Government further tightened travel bans on Russia by prohibiting the supply of commercial drones and components, including the provision of related services.
     
  • We also expect to see continued use of Magnitsky-style sanctions in relation to human rights abuses, and further targeted sanctions aimed at addressing malicious cyber activity. Consistent with this, in February 2025, the Minister for Foreign Affairs announced further cyber sanctions in response to the Medibank Private cyberattack.
     
  • We anticipate that the Australian Government will continue to align some of these sanctions measures with policy decisions of other key jurisdictions, such as the US, UK and EU – however, it remains to be seen whether the change of government in the US will precipitate any substantive changes to the US sanctions framework.
     
  • As part of the ASO review of Australia’s sanctions laws, a report was released in October 2024 summarising the key themes arising from submissions received from a range of Australian stakeholders including across industry, academia, civil society and government. The key themes highlight potential reform areas, including streamlining the legal framework, clarifying critical terms, enhancing the permit process, introducing humanitarian exceptions, and considering amendments to sanctions offences and penalties. As of January 2025, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) indicated that recommendations for legislative change and other reforms were put to Government and remain under consideration. We therefore expect further developments from this review across 2025. See HSF’s detailed update on the ASO’s report here.
     
  • Additionally, on 3 July 2024, the Senate referred an inquiry into Australia's sanctions regime to the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Reference Committee (Senate Committee) for inquiry and report by 11 February 2025. The scope of the inquiry included (among other things) an assessment of the consistency in application of Australia’s sanctions regime and in coordination with key partners, consideration of the evidence on how sanctions regimes are targeting and addressing behaviour of designated individuals and entities, consideration of methods to assess the effectiveness of sanctions decisions, and consideration of the role of sanctions in an increasingly complex global context. Following a public hearing in November 2024, the Senate Committee published its report on 11 February 2025, making eight recommendations, which were described as being aimed at addressing the Senate Committee’s three key concerns arising from the public submissions and hearing: inconsistencies in sanctions application, underutilisation of thematic sanctions, and delays in applying sanctions already applied by partner states. See HSF’s detailed update on the Senate Committee’s report here.
     
  • One month after the release of the above Senate Committee report, on 7 March 2025, the Human Rights Subcommittee of the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade (Joint Committee) published its report into the operation of amendments made by the Autonomous Sanctions Amendment (Magnitsky-style and Other Thematic Sanctions) Act 2021 (the Amending Act). Under section 4 of the Amending Act, the Joint Committee was required to commence a review of the operation of the amendments made by the Act as soon as possible after 8 December 2024. On 8 December 2024, the Joint Committee announced its inquiry, and subsequently received seven submissions from a range of stakeholders and held a public hearing in January 2025. The Joint Committee’s report built upon a number of observations of the Senate Committee in its February 2025 report, including acknowledging there are areas in which Australia’s thematic sanctions framework can be strengthened and reforms are therefore warranted, particularly to address concerns regarding consistency and transparency. The Joint Committee made a further five recommendations aimed at strengthening Australia’s application of thematic sanctions. See HSF’s detailed update on the Joint Committee’s report here.
     
  • Notably, the ASO also released a package of materials to assist Australians and Australian businesses to comply with certain aspects of Australian sanctions laws. The ASO’s materials – which include a Sanctions Compliance Toolkit, Sanctions Risk Assessment Tool, and new and updated guidance and advisory notes – aim to provide practical guidance and actionable steps that can be taken to operationalise sanctions compliance. Steps identified in the guidance may also assist entities to understand what is expected by the ASO in relation to their approach to sanctions due diligence. It will be important for regulated entities to carefully consider this guidance against their current approach to sanctions compliance and due diligence, noting that the ASO materials emphasise that compliance programs must always be tailored to the specific risks and activities of the entity. Relevantly, two of the guidance notes issued by the ASO relate to dealing with controlled assets, and financial transactions involving designated persons and entities. These are areas where we often see requests for assistance from corporate clients regarding the scope and application of these sanctions measures. For further information on these materials, see HSF’s detailed update here.
     
  • Finally, general permits issued by the ASO in December 2022 and February 2023, authorising provision of financial assistance and financial services in respect of Russian oil and refined petroleum purchased at or below a price cap, and the transport by ship of Russian oil and refined petroleum purchased at or below a price cap, were due to expire in December 2024 and February 2025. All entities that previously advised of their reliance on these permits were contacted by the ASO to arrange for replacement permits to be issued and the two general permits were revoked in December 2024. Two other general permits which give effect to the remaining aspects of the oil and petroleum price caps were due to expire in February 2025. Similarly, the ASO indicated that it contacted all entities that previously advised of their reliance on these two permits to discuss their requirements for a permit beyond February 2025.

Following from the multiple Parliamentary and Government reviews noted above, it remains to be seen what legislative amendments to Australia’s sanctions framework, if any, will be proposed throughout 2025.

Compliance and enforcement activity

At the public hearing before the Senate Committee on 15 November 2024 (see above), submissions made by the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and ASO to the Senate Committee gave some insights into the investigations and potential enforcement activity on foot regarding sanctions compliance. In particular:

  • The AFP indicated they have four active sanctions investigations on foot, referred from the ASO.
     
  • The ASO indicated that DFAT has over 21 sanctions compliance matters presently under review, some of which may result in referrals to the AFP.
     
  • The ASO has also had increased funding under the most recent budget, which may enable greater resources for monitoring and compliance.

No further information on enforcement activity was outlined in the submissions provided to, or at the public hearing before, the Joint Committee.

We will closely monitor whether any enforcement actions are commenced throughout 2025 arising from these investigations.


Australian Corporate Crime and Investigations Outlook 2025

Key contacts

Leon Chung photo

Leon Chung

Partner, Sydney

Leon Chung
Jacqueline Wootton photo

Jacqueline Wootton

Partner, Brisbane

Jacqueline Wootton
Priscilla Bourne photo

Priscilla Bourne

Senior Associate, Brisbane

Priscilla Bourne

Stay in the know

We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs

Sydney Australia Perth Brisbane Melbourne Sanctions Corporate Crime and Investigations Financial Institutions Mining Technology, Media and Telecommunications Manufacturing and Industrials Energy Real Estate Infrastructure Consumer Corporate Crime and Investigations Leon Chung Jacqueline Wootton Priscilla Bourne