Banking Litigation Notes
Tag: contractual estoppel
Showing 8 out of 8 results
11 May 2022
High Court dismisses IRHP mis-selling and unlawful means conspiracy claims against bank
28 October 2021
High Court upholds contractual terms setting out basis of relationship in dismissing breach of duty claim relating to introduction to third party investment schemes
09 December 2020
High Court considers First Tower judgment in the context of no-advice clauses and confirms UCTA does not apply
13 June 2018
High Court rejects the first IRHP mis-selling claim brought by private persons under Section 138D FSMA
The High Court has rejected the first interest rate hedging product ("IRHP") mis-selling claim brought by private persons under section 138D of the …
31 May 2018
High Court rejects unfair relationship claim concerning allegations of breach of an advisory duty, misrepresentation and efficacy of basis clauses
Carney & Ors v NM Rothschild & Sons Limited [2018] EWHC 958 (Comm) is a recent case where the High Court rejected claims of an unfair …
21 December 2017
Latest IRHP "Mis-selling judgment confirms no "mezzanine" duty of care owed by banks
05 January 2016
Thornbridge Limited v Barclays Bank: Confirmation of the court's current approach to IRHP mis-selling claims is good news for financial institutions
The latest in a recent line of judgments on interest rate hedging product ("IRHP") mis-selling, Thornbridge Limited v Barclays Bank plc [2015] …
17 May 2013