Follow us

In recent years the TCC has levelled forceful criticism of experts who have failed to display proper independence.  However, in the latest TCC judgment of Blackpool Borough Council v Volkerfitzpatrick Ltd & Ors [2020] EWHC 387 (TCC), the court refused to grant an application for expert evidence to be ruled inadmissible and the claim that it supported be struck out.  The court found on the facts that, while the experts may not have followed best practice, they had not breached their duties under CPR Part 35 or otherwise compromised their independence.

The case is particularly interesting as it addresses a common scenario whereby the parties jointly engage a third party testing house to undertake certain site tests and investigations for the party-appointed experts to use in their analysis.  The defendant objected to the claimant’s experts’ unilateral communications with the testing house, and more so to their later request to the testing house to conduct further tests without informing the other experts.   This will be a welcome judgment at a time when we are seeing an increasing number of threatened and actual challenges to experts in litigation and arbitration.

To access the full article on this case, please click here.

[show_profile name='Emma' surname='Schaafsma' jobtitle='Partner, Dispute Resolution' phone='+44 20 7466 2597']


Article tags

Related categories

Key contacts

James Doe photo

James Doe

Partner and Joint Global Head of Construction & Infrastructure Disputes, London

James Doe
Ante Golem photo

Ante Golem

Head of Disputes, Australia, Perth

Ante Golem
Geoffrey Hansen photo

Geoffrey Hansen

Partner, Melbourne

Geoffrey Hansen
Tim Healey photo

Tim Healey

Partner, London

Tim Healey
Toby Anderson photo

Toby Anderson

Partner, Sydney

Toby Anderson
Noe Minamikata photo

Noe Minamikata

Professional Support Lawyer, London

Noe Minamikata
Becky Johnson photo

Becky Johnson

Professional Support Lawyer, London

Becky Johnson