Follow us

The FSA's Retail Conduct Risk Outlook (RCRO), published today, sets out the highest priority retail conduct risks, grouped into 15 categories.  These are the risks on which firms should (and the regulator intends to) focus with particular care through the period of transition of conduct regulation to the new Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
Several issues identified in the 2011 RCRO - notably the development and marketing of structured deposits, the impact of UCITS IV on the ongoing quality of advice, and tax changes and their implications for financial products - are no longer considered risks with a high priority regulatory focus, although the FSA stresses that firms should still be concerned about the related risks.

TOP 15 RETAIL CONDUCT RISK CATEGORIES

 1.     Aligning business models to fair treatment of consumers

  • Incentives
    • Reward policies and practices
    • Cross-selling
  • Changing business models in the life insurance sector
  • Use of technology in payments
  • Divestments, acquisitions and new players in retail banking

2.     Complexity in retail products and services

  • Development and marketing of structured investment products
  • Traded Life Policy Investments
  • UCIS
  • Private Banking
  • Exchange Traded Products
  • Absolute Return Products

3.     Firm's responses to regulatory and/or legislative change

  • Responses to the Banking Conduct Regime
  • Retail Distribution Review (RDR)
    • Transition to RDR
    • Business Model Change post RDR
  • Solvency II
  • Mortgage Market Review
  • Pensions reform
  • Gender Pricing in insurance

4.     General Insurance

  • Consumer focus on initial premium
  • Products of limited value
  • Add-ons
  • Payment Protection Products

5.     Governance of funds in life offices

  • Communication and management of risk profile of Life Assurance Funds
  • With profits fund operation

6.     Host authorised corporate directors

7.     Inadequate complaints handling

  • Complaints handling in major banks
  • Payment protection insurance

8.     Investment propositions

  • Use of platforms
  • Centralised investment propositions (portfolio advice, discretionary portfolio management and distributor influenced funds)

9.     Investment risk profiling

10.   Investor compensation protection

11.   Mortgages

  • Unfair terms in mortgage contracts
  • Unfair treatment of mortgage customers in arrears (notably charges)
  • Misuse of buy-to-let mortgages
  • Mortgage product innovation
  • Capital repayment of interest only mortgages at maturity

12.   Pensions and retirement planning

  • SIPPs
  • Enhanced transfer value
  • Decumulation

13.   Product bundling

  • Packaged accounts
  • Bundling of investment and deposit products

14.   Projections

15.   Systems and controls weaknesses in the network model 

 

In the process of making this assessment of risks, the FSA undertook qualitative research from consumers on their key concerns regarding their interaction with financial services providers.  Those key concerns, which reflected a perceived erosion of trust between consumers and their financial service providers, included:

  • Pressure selling
  • Lack of ongoing service, focus on single transactions and new customers
  • Poor complaints handling
  • Ineffective time management (resolving issues, making transfers)
  • Difficulties in switching, cancelling or altering instructions
  • Failures in systems/human error and poor infrastructure
  • Complexity and volume of communications
  • Excessive or unfair charges
  • Changing terms and conditions

Annex 2 of the 2012 RCRO helpfully maps the high priority risks to the following sectors, in the light of the key environmental trends for each sector:

  • Retail banking [page101]
  • Asset management - including private client management [page103]
  • Insurance intermediary [page105]
  • Retail intermediary [page107]

Firms should however note that these sectoral maps are not a comprehensive list of the lists relevant to each sector or to individual firms - the FSA expects firms to make their own determination as to the risks most relevant to their particular businesses, and to take action to monitor and control those risks.


Article tags

Key contacts

Karen Anderson photo

Karen Anderson

Consultant, London

Karen Anderson
Susannah Cogman photo

Susannah Cogman

Partner, London

Susannah Cogman
Elizabeth Head photo

Elizabeth Head

Of Counsel, London

Elizabeth Head
Hannah Cassidy photo

Hannah Cassidy

Partner, Head of Financial Services Regulatory, Asia, Hong Kong

Hannah Cassidy
Clive Cunningham photo

Clive Cunningham

Partner, London

Clive Cunningham
Marina Reason photo

Marina Reason

Partner, London

Marina Reason
Kelesi Blundell photo

Kelesi Blundell

Partner, London

Kelesi Blundell
Jenny Stainsby photo

Jenny Stainsby

Global Head – Financial Services Regulatory, London

Jenny Stainsby
Hywel Jenkins photo

Hywel Jenkins

Partner, London

Hywel Jenkins
Chris Ninan photo

Chris Ninan

Partner, London

Chris Ninan
Jon Ford photo

Jon Ford

Partner, London

Jon Ford
Valerie Tao photo

Valerie Tao

Professional Support Lawyer, Hong Kong

Valerie Tao
Cat Dankos photo

Cat Dankos

Regulatory Consultant, London

Cat Dankos
Patricia Horton photo

Patricia Horton

Professional Support Lawyer, London

Patricia Horton