Further to the brief post we published on the April judgment in DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v Sit Pan Jit (HCA 382/2009), our team in Hong Kong have published some more detailed comments on this most recent of cases upholding the principles of contractual estoppel and enforcing the terms of the written contract between the parties. Given that that case turned upon its specific facts, we also consider some steps that can be taken to help banks protect themselves from customer claims in circumstances where investments go wrong.
Key contacts
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.