Follow us

The Federal Court has rejected the Australian Patent Office’s historical approach to patent term extension (PTE) applications, upholding a challenge brought by two major pharmaceutical companies against an earlier decision of Australia’s Commissioner of Patents.

KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • Justice Beach has confirmed that PTE applications must be filed within six months of the first inclusion on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) of the patentee’s own goods, regardless of whether earlier-listed third party goods may also contain a pharmaceutical substance covered by the patent.
  • This brings Australia into line with other key jurisdictions, including the US.
  • Although the interpretation adopted by the Court represents a more commercial and practical outcome for patentees, reasonable minds may differ as to the correct interpretation of the Patents Act 1990.
  • It remains to be seen whether the Commissioner of Patents will seek to appeal the decision to the Full Federal Court.

Click here to read our analysis.

Related categories

Key contacts

Rebekah Gay photo

Rebekah Gay

Partner and Joint Global Head of Intellectual Property, Sydney

Rebekah Gay
Laura Orlando photo

Laura Orlando

Italy Managing Partner, Joint Global Head of Intellectual Property, EMEA Co-Head of Life Sciences, Milan

Laura Orlando
Sue Gilchrist photo

Sue Gilchrist

Partner and Head of Intellectual Property, Australia, Sydney

Sue Gilchrist
Peng Lei photo

Peng Lei

Partner, Kewei, Mainland China

Peng Lei
Alexandra Neri photo

Alexandra Neri

Partner, Paris

Alexandra Neri
Dr Ina vom Feld photo

Dr Ina vom Feld

Partner, Germany

Dr Ina vom Feld
Sebastian Moore photo

Sebastian Moore

Partner and Head of Intellectual Property, UK, London and Milan

Sebastian Moore
Rachel Montagnon photo

Rachel Montagnon

Professional Support Consultant, London

Rachel Montagnon