The Court of Appeal has found that a first instance judge erred in his application of the correct test to determine whether a default interest clause amounted to an unenforceable penalty: Houssein v London Credit Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 721.
Applying the test from the leading case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi (Rev 3) [2015] UKSC 67 (considered here), the Court of Appeal held that the clause was designed to protect the lenders' "legitimate interest" in securing repayment of monies due under the lending agreement, but remitted to the trial judge the question of whether the clause was out of all proportion to that interest, ie whether it was "extortionate, exorbitant or unconscionable", and therefore penal.
For more information see this post on our Banking Litigation Notes blog.
Key contacts
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.