Tag: supreme court
Showing 12 out of 12 results
Cost implications at the permission stage for those bringing judicial reviews
Build in breach of restrictive covenants at your peril!
Supreme Court's input required on dealing with restrictive covenants
A bonanza for empty rates schemes?
Indigestion for landlords: a new acid test for redevelopment under ground (f)
In October, we wrote about the Supreme Court case S. Franses Ltd v The Cavendish Hotel (London) Limited [2018] UKSC 62, concerning a landlord’s ability …
Landlords' motives for redevelopment – good, bad or irrelevant?
Today the Supreme Court will hear the case of S. Franses Ltd v The Cavendish Hotel (London) Limited, a case which property litigators have been following …
HMRC wins landmark SDLT avoidance case
In a 4-1 ruling, the Supreme Court has found in favour of HMRC in the long-running saga of Project Blue Limited v. HMRC (2018) UKSC 30, to the effect …
TOUCHING THE VOID – Mazars Revisited
Not many outside the business rates bubble will have been following the twists and turns of the Mazars case and its aftermath. Stripping away the …
Reasons to be cheerful
It is good practice for a local planning authority to give reasons for the grant of planning permission. Failure to give adequate reasons may be serious …
Supreme Court ruling on negligent property valuations: Tiuta International v De Villiers Surveyors [2017] UKSC 77
The Supreme Court judgement in the case of Tiuta International v De Villiers Surveyors was handed down at the end of last month. The case involves …
Black Wednesday for M&S as it loses Supreme Court Battle...
The Supreme Court unanimously rules that, in the absence of express wording in the lease, Marks and Spencer is not entitled to an apportioned refund of …
Bad Bargain? Bad news! Says the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has ruled that tenants will not necessarily be saved from bad bargains even if service charge provisions require them to pay sums well …