Stay in the know
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs
The quality of the air we breathe remains a hot topic for 2017. A series of legal and political developments have catalysed growing concern among the public towards the health risks of air pollution, especially in urban areas. In this article, we consider the key topics and how businesses may be impacted.
The problem
Concerns over air quality are not new – the Great Smog across London in 1952 led to the Clean Air Act 1956 and there are earlier legal precursors. Measures put in place were assumed to have solved the issue without perhaps an adequate amount of regulatory attention to ongoing monitoring of their effectiveness. Instead they have been caught short by technological change and particularly the mushrooming of urban traffic congestion and perverse (albeit well-intentioned) incentives for consumers to own diesel cars.
The bubble was essentially burst by court action brought by ClientEarth plus the VW 'Dieselgate' emissions scandal, which have together precipitated regulatory risk, whereby we await new policy proposals in a revised national air quality plan to be issued. The UK is simultaneously under threat of legal proceedings before the European Court of Justice for failure to meet relevant EU limits in 16 areas of the country.
We round-up in this article the principal developments to watch and suggest how they might play out.
1. ClientEarth (No.2) decision
On 2 November 2016, the High Court ruled that DEFRA's national air quality plan was insufficient to achieve the EU air quality limits for nitrogen dioxide in the shortest possible time.
The EU Air Quality Directive 2008 sets out the limit values for particular pollutants for the protection of human health. Where the limit values are exceeded, the Government is required to prepare an air quality plan which includes measures to achieve compliance within the shortest possible time. DEFRA must publish a new air quality plan for submission to the European Commission ("EC") by 31 July 2017. It has committed to issue it for public consultation first by 24th April.
The EC also recently issued a final warning (a reasoned opinion) to the UK (along with Germany, France, Spain and Italy) to adopt and implement a plan to bring 16 UK air quality zones into compliance as soon as possible. DEFRA has 2 months to respond with appropriate measures it is taking to rectify the issue in order to avoid possible legal proceedings before the EU courts.
Key takeaways
2. Volkswagen emissions tests scandal and diesel cars
Road transport, particularly in high density urban areas, has been identified as a key source of air pollution. Four recent transport-related developments are of note:
Key takeaways
3. The Heathrow runway expansion
Following Prime Minister Theresa May's decision to approve the Heathrow expansion in October 2016, four local councils and Greenpeace launched a joint legal challenge on grounds that the expansion will lead to the UK's failure to meet climate change and air pollution standards. This has since been struck out as it was held to be "premature" and the Government must first prepare the National Policy Statement ("NPS").
An NPS for new runway capacity and infrastructure at airports in the south east of England is currently under consultation until 25 May 2017. The current draft states that if Heathrow fails to demonstrate that the expansion will not affect the UK's ability to meet legal air quality requirements, then development consent will be refused. However, the Environmental Audit Committee is critical of the Government's approach and said that "the Government looks set to water down the limits on aviation emissions".
Key takeaways
4. Medium Combustion Plant Directive
The rapid growth in emissions from diesel-fuelled low-cost, small scale flexible power generators in recent years, encouraged in the UK by the electricity capacity market mechanism, has also been identified as a cause for concern necessitating EU-wide action. The Government is expected to transpose the Medium Combustion Plant Directive (the "MCPD") agreed in 2015 into domestic law by December 2017 as required. Over 30,000 medium combustion plants (with 1-50MW rated thermal input) are believed to be affected – these include engines powering heating and cooling in buildings and generating steam in industrial facilities that are not currently caught by the regulations on combustion plant over 50MW. The new legislation will over time require permits, set emissions limits and require operators to test emissions from their plants to demonstrate compliance with emissions limits for both new and existing plant.
Yet the Government's analysis also suggests that the proposed MCPD measures will not be sufficient. It consulted early in 2017 on additional measures to control emissions and is expected to publish its response to the comments received by 8th May 2017.
Key takeaways
5. Brexit and air quality
Until exit negotiations are concluded, the UK remains a full member of the EU and is required to negotiate, implement and apply that legislation. The Great Repeal Bill will transpose all EU law existing at the time of Brexit into domestic law. However, there are concerns regarding the practicalities of transposing law that is based on a different interpretative approach, and often refers to EU guidance, other EU legislation and EU bodies. The think-tank IPPR published a report on the same day as the recent ClientEarth (No.2) judgment, which confirms our view that the UK's departure from the EU means that legislation on air pollution limits could be repealed and standards reduced.
The Great Repeal Bill is expected to be introduced at the start of the next parliamentary session in May 2017 and is likely to contain "Henry VIII" clauses granting power to Government Ministers to make changes to "saved" EU legislation to allow it to function. The precise scope for change could end up being wider so as to allow early changes to air quality limits. Alternatively, relaxation of limits could be made through later amendments by Parliament. Note that the EC's Brexit negotiator has already warned the UK against watering down environmental regulation as this may give the UK an unfair competitive advantage.
6. Considerations for Business
Air quality is an important consideration in planning decisions and is relevant where development is: a) likely to affect the air quality in a poor air quality area, b) adversely impact air quality strategies and action plans (which will include the revised air quality plan), and/or c) lead to a breach of legal limits. Air quality is increasingly a cause of objections and challenges. Air quality was the main issue in a judicial review of the planning decision for the Greenwich Port cruise liner terminal and was the reason a recent planning application for 300+ houses in Swale was dismissed.
Local authorities are also obliged under the local air quality management regime to review and assess air quality in their area in light of national emissions limits, and devise air quality strategies and action plans. The recent developments addressed above may increase the pressure on local authorities to further address air quality in local and neighbourhood plans, Merton Council, for example, has taken this step and will be introducing a diesel vehicle levy charge of up to £150 for resident, business or trade parking permits.
For environmental permitting, the need to reduce releases of pollutants to air may result in a re-evaluation of best available technology and a ratcheting down of emissions limits for both new facilities and for existing facilities (through permit variations).
The ability to demonstrate that impacts on air quality have been minimised is likely to become a more important aspect of community relations, especially for facilities in close proximity to schools and hospitals.
As the science develops, it may before long be possible for persons whose health is affected by air pollutants to establish the likely source of those pollutants, raising the prospect of negligence claims. It is therefore increasingly important for businesses with air emissions to carefully consider the potential risk of harm and take steps to manage it.
The contents of this publication are for reference purposes only and may not be current as at the date of accessing this publication. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action based on this publication.
© Herbert Smith Freehills 2024
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs