Stay in the know
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs
All company directors (including those based overseas) will soon be required to register for a unique ‘Director Identification Number’ in a bid to crackdown on illegal phoenix activity. This requirement is likely to commence by mid-2021.
Australia’s 35 existing business registries are set to be streamlined into a single, ‘super-registry’ responsible for administering the names and other details of all business entities and certain registered professionals.
Two long-awaited reforms to Australia’s corporate governance regime have recently passed the Federal Parliament:
The legislative package consists of five bills (together the Bills),1 and forms part of the Government’s National Business Simplification Initiative, which is aimed at reducing the complexity of regulation for businesses and making their dealings with government easier. In this article, we discuss what these reforms mean for businesses operating in Australia and how to get ready for their implementation.
All ‘eligible officers’ will be required to register for a unique identification number (DIN) that can be used to track their former and current roles across different corporations over time. Eligible officers is defined to include:
To prevent the use of false identities, eligible officers will be required to provide proof of their identity upon registration. While the details are yet to be confirmed, it is likely the process will follow the 100 point identity verification process commonly used by government departments.
DINs are principally aimed at combatting illegal phoenix activity, which generally involves winding up an indebted company and transferring its assets to a separate entity to avoid paying liabilities. It is hoped that DIN’s will assist anti-phoenixing enforcement efforts by enabling a director’s corporate history – in particular, their ties to failed companies – to be easily traced, as well as preventing the registration of fictitious names by directors as a means of evading the scrutiny of regulators.
The introduction of DINs follows the passage of a raft of anti-phoenixing reforms earlier this year, which included:
Apart from enhancing director accountability, it is expected that the new regime will also improve the efficiency of the insolvency process by enabling directors to be more readily identified and tracked by administrators and liquidators.
Watch this space. The regime will commence on a date fixed by proclamation, which reports indicate is likely to be by mid-2021.
For the 12 months following the commencement of the regime, a director will have 28 days after their appointment to register for a DIN, after which it will be mandatory for prospective directors to obtain a DIN before their appointment. The date by which existing directors must obtain a DIN will be fixed by regulation at a later date.
The Australian Business Register and the 34 individual business registries maintained by ASIC are set to be revamped into a single, streamlined database. Administered by the Australian Taxation Office, this new ‘super-registry’ will be responsible for maintaining the names and details of:
This new regime is designed to overcome the inefficiency of businesses having to update their information across multiple separate registries. It also seeks to facilitate better use of business data by government and regulators, which is currently limited by the inconsistent rules and systems used by the existing registries.
As with DINs, this reform is also aimed at bolstering corporate accountability. As the Final Report of the Black Economy Taskforce observed in 2017, the existing fragmented approach to business registries is open to misuse by fraudulent operators seeking to evade tax and regulatory operations.
Initially, it is expected that the new ‘super-registry’ will contain the same information held by the existing business registries, which consists of a mix of basic public data and non-public data accessible by certain government bodies. However, the registry will have the ability to set new ‘data standards’ regarding the information that entities and persons covered by the regime must disclose. It is expected that this power will be used to move towards a uniform approach towards data collection, in line with the legislation’s object of facilitating a registry regime that’s “flexible, technology neutral and governance neutral.”3
Like its predecessors, the "super-registry" will provide a touchpoint for the public and government bodies seeking to verify business information. The Government has also said the initiative will “lay the foundation stone for future ‘regtech’ initiatives” – meaning the use of technology by businesses to manage regulatory compliance. It is clear that the Government envisages a growing role for regtech in Australia’s regulatory landscape, particularly in the financial services sector. In 2019, it established a Senate Select Committee tasked with examining, among other things, the opportunities for consumers and businesses arising from FinTech and RegTech – including the opportunities for RegTech to strengthen compliance and reduce costs. The committee’s final report is due on 16 April 2021.4
The contents of this publication are for reference purposes only and may not be current as at the date of accessing this publication. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action based on this publication.
© Herbert Smith Freehills 2024
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs