Stay in the know
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs
This artilce is an adapted version of a briefing paper prepared with the economics consultancy, Oxera, in connection with our joint webinar event on the European Green Deal and its implications for regulation, State aid and competition policy. The webinar, which will feature speakers from the European Commission, the judiciary and private practice, will take place this Thursday 9 July 2020 from 11:00 to 12:30 CEST and the registration link is available here.
The European Green Deal, launched by the new Von der Leyen Commission in December 2019, was positioned as a chance to “reset” the EU’s commitment to tackling climate and environmental-related challenges. This ambition found reflection in a series of potentially far-reaching proposals, at the heart of which is the goal to achieve climate neutrality by 2050.
Central to the European Green Deal will be the development of an industrial strategy and a regulatory framework to enable firms to deliver the technologies, infrastructure, market arrangements and networks necessary to achieve greater sustainability. At the same time, managing the transition and mitigating the impacts of the consequent structural changes on business models and dependencies will require a substantial, if not equally significant policy response. On both sides of this equation, EU regulation, State aid and competition policy have the potential to make a significant contribution in reformulating markets and shaping public interventions to deliver the desired outcomes as well as in setting parameters for collaboration between firms to achieve sustainability aims.
In the meantime and since the launching of the European Green Deal, the COVID-19 pandemic has raised unique challenges to which the EU regulatory, State aid and competition policy landscape have had to adapt at speed. In particular, the European Commission has established “temporary frameworks” in both the State aid and the competition law areas which provide for certain relaxations of the rules targeted to what is necessary to respond to the exceptional circumstances resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak while attempting to limit consequent distortions to competition.
Against this background, this briefing paper provides some thoughts to stimulate the discussions on three key questions which are expected to be central to the debate:
Managing Partner, Competition Regulation and Trade, Brussels
The contents of this publication are for reference purposes only and may not be current as at the date of accessing this publication. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action based on this publication.
© Herbert Smith Freehills 2024
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs