For the second time in two years, Hong Kong's government has announced that it will introduce amendments to the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609). The proposed amendments are designed to remove legal uncertainties relating to the Schedule 2 "opt-in mechanism" for domestic arbitration.
The Department of Justice announced the proposed changes on 21 January, in response to requests by Hong Kong's arbitration community. The Bill was gazetted on 23 January.
The amendments would allow parties to domestic arbitrations in Hong Kong to decide on the number of arbitrators. Currently, although parties to Hong Kong arbitrations are generally free to determine the number of arbitrators (s.23 Arbitration Ordinance), domestic arbitrations to which Schedule 2 of the Arbitration Ordinance applies must be submitted to a sole arbitrator.
Other proposed amendments include updating the Ordinance's list of parties to the the New York Convention, to reflect the addition of Bhutan, Burundi, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Guyana as new states party to the Convention, and the British Virgin Islands (following the UK's recent notification to extend the territorial application of the New York Convention to the BVI).
The Arbitration (Amendment) Bill 2015, which contains the above amendments, was gazetted on 23 January and will be introduced into Hong Kong's Legislative Council on 4 February.
The proposed amendments are to be welcomed, as a further indication that Hong Kong is willing to update its arbitral legislation regularly, and to respond to feedback from its arbitral community.
Key contacts
Simon Chapman KC
Partner, Regional Head of Practice - Dispute Resolution, Asia, Global Co-Head of International Arbitration, Hong Kong
Andrew Cannon
Partner, Global Co-Head of International Arbitration and of Public International Law, London
Christian Leathley
Partner, Co-Head of the Latin America Group, Co-Head of the Public International Law Group, US Head of International Arbitration, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.