All blog posts
Showing 5 out of 5 results
Claimants who settled on "no costs" basis held liable for costs through back door
In circumstances where two claimants had settled their claims against the defendant on a "no costs" basis and a third claimant had continued to …
Court of Appeal explores ambit of the without prejudice rule
The Court of Appeal has recently held that certain correspondence marked "without prejudice" was admissible in evidence despite this label, because there …
Court of Appeal confirms time for claiming contribution to damages runs from acceptance of Part 36 offer
The Court of Appeal has held that, where a claim was settled by acceptance of a Part 36 offer, the defendant's two-year limitation period for bringing a …
Article published on effect of settlement offers in non-money claims
A recent Court of Appeal decision provides useful guidance on how the court will determine the effect of a "without prejudice save as to costs" (or …
"Opening shot" protected by without prejudice privilege
The High Court has held that a draft Complaint in New York proceedings sent to the other party marked as a "preliminary draft" and "for settlement …
Showing 5 out of 5 results