Follow us


Central Asia1 may become a future global supplier of critical minerals and hub for renewable energy. The region's strategic location, mineral wealth and meteorological profile coupled with ongoing strategic economic reforms make it a potential hotspot for international investment. However, investors are advised to adopt appropriate safeguards to successfully navigate Central Asia's legal landscape. In this article, we highlight opportunities presented by the region and provide guidance for managing identified risks.  

Many critical minerals are essential to an array of green energy technologies, such as electric vehicles, wind turbines and solar panels. Illustrating this, the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimated that reaching the 2oC target set by the Paris Agreement will require "a quadrupling of mineral requirements for clean energy technologies by 2040".

Despite its outstanding wealth of resources, Central Asia is often omitted from analyses of critical mineral supply chains – for example, only Kazakhstan's resources got a cursory mention in the IEA's Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2024.3 This may be due to historically strict non-tariff trade barriers4 and an unfamiliar legislative environment which may have deterred foreign investors in the past. 

Yet some of the Central Asian states sit among the world's top 20 producers for critical minerals which are most essential to the development of green technology. For example, Kazakhstan has the world's largest reserves of chromium – a key material for wind turbines, and is tied with Turkey as the second largest producer in the world.5 It ranks among the top ten countries globally for its substantial zinc reserves.6 Similarly, Uzbekistan is among the world's top ten producers of uranium, rhenium and tellurium.7 It is also in the top 15 countries for copper reserves and among the top twenty for molybdenum and cadmium reserves.8 In addition, the Central Asia region holds significant reserves of manganese, lead, zinc and titanium.

Unearthing Central Asia's hidden (green) power 

Green energy technologies, which depend on critical minerals, have become a major driver of demand for these resources. This is relevant in Central Asia: in addition to geological suitability for critical mineral extraction, its meteorological profile makes it a promising location for renewable energy generation. In future, it may therefore be possible to source key critical minerals and generate green energy from the same region. For example, there is excellent solar and wind power generation potential in Kazakhstan. Uzbekistan similarly possesses significant hydro and wind potential. Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan are particularly well-suited to hydropower, whilst Turkmenistan has strong prospects for solar power generation.10

Regional legislative developments have taken steps towards decarbonization and encouraging international investment, thereby enhancing Central Asia's potential for renewable energy generation. For example, Kazakhstan aims to reach carbon neutrality by 2060 and for 50% of energy to be produced from renewable energy sources by 205011, having hit its target for 3% of energy generation to be renewable by 2020.12 Similarly, Tajikistan aims for carbon neutrality by 205013 and so does Uzbekistan (although specifically targeting its power sector).14 This, in combination with recent mining reforms, means there is a growing opportunity for foreign investors. For example, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) is assisting Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan in efforts to modernise domestic mining legislation15, while Kyrgyzstan may shortly introduce a reformed mining code.16 

The investment opportunity  

Central Asian states have expressed willingness to work with investors to exploit their mineral reserves and generate renewable energy. For example: Kazakh President Tokayev firmly "support(s)… the construction of power plants using renewable energy sources".17 This finds steadfast support in the "Kazakhstan-2050 Strategy" (2012), the Concept on Transition towards Green Economy until 2050 (2013), and the 100 Concrete Steps programme (2015).18 This legislation facilitates development through structural reform and by supporting green energy developments. Uzbekistan's President Mirziyoyev has shared this sentiment and intends to more than triple the country's renewable energy production in the next ten years19, having recently implemented related investment reforms.20 Indeed, Uzbekistan is seeking foreign investment of $70 billion in 2022-2026, including in the energy sector.21 In the same vein, in June 2024 Kyrgyzstan lifted a ban on uranium extraction to boost economic growth.22 

Foreign investors therefore have an opportunity to facilitate regional ambitions to decarbonise and develop. However, they must proceed with caution and mitigate investment risks. 

Bridging differences through arbitration 

Engaging with an unfamiliar judicial system can be challenging, particularly when it could impact the enforcement of contractual safeguards. However, alternatives to domestic litigation exist, including international arbitration. This may be facilitated by regional arbitral institutions, such as the International Arbitration Centre (IAC) at the Astana International Financial Centre in Kazakhstan and the Tashkent International Arbitration Centre.23  

Advantages of international arbitration include certainty, with arbitral awards being final and binding, while being subject to limited grounds for annulment. Further, parties can determine the specifics of the arbitral process. They may appoint subject matter experts to adjudicate their disputes, while proceedings are private and usually confidential. International arbitration also benefits from an international framework for recognition and enforcement under the New York Convention 195824 which has 172 signatories, including the Central Asian states.25

  1. It is generally advisable to draft the clause in a comprehensive manner to encompass all types of dispute, including both contractual and non-contractual.
  2. Agree on the arbitral seat (also referred to as the legal place of the arbitration), which determines the court that carries supervisory jurisdiction. We recommend opting for a neutral seat with a well-established legal framework for arbitration, sophisticated judicial system and which can provide certainty and predictability to the parties.
  3. It is generally advisable to opt for institutional rather than ad hoc arbitration. In institutional arbitration, proceedings are overseen by a specific arbitration institution, such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) or the IAC in Kazakhstan. These institutions provide a framework and set of rules to guide the arbitration process, ensuring consistency and adherence to best practice. In contrast, ad hoc arbitration proceedings are not supported by a specific institution. Such arbitrations are usually more flexible and sometimes regarded as more cost efficient. However, lack of institutional support often leads to challenges in managing the arbitration, particularly in complex disputes.  

Please note that the above list is non-exhaustive and other considerations may be relevant when agreeing an arbitration clause.

Decoding state defences

Extractive and infrastructure projects often involve contracting with the state or state-affiliated entities. These entities will often benefit from state immunity, which provides protection against being sued, and from the enforcement of judgments and awards. It is therefore important to include a waiver of state immunity in an agreement with the state or its affiliates to ensure the ability to claim under the agreement and enforce it against the state's assets. 

  1. Undertake counterparty due diligence to identify if a party is likely to benefit from state immunity.
  2. Include a waiver of state immunity in relevant contractual agreements.
  3. Ensure the waiver covers immunity from jurisdiction (ie protection given to a state from being sued in the courts of other states) and immunity from enforcement.

Please note that state immunity is complex and requires specialist consideration.

The changing legislative landscape

Stability is key to critical minerals and green energy projects, particularly considering their extended duration. Investors should consider how legislation might change over the lifetime of an investment. However, it may be possible to preserve the economics of an investment through careful drafting.
 

Depending on the applicable law, contractual protections can sometimes provide protection against legislative change, for example:

  1. Stabilisation clauses could address the impact of regulatory and/or legislative change, e.g., by ensuring that the framework existing at the date of the contract or the date of the investment does not become more stringent vis-à-vis the investment.
  2. Adjustment clauses provide for alteration of terms underlying an investment to reflect significant circumstantial changes affecting the contracting parties.
  3. Hardship clauses enable a party suffering financial hardship to renegotiate and, in certain circumstances, request contractual adaptation.

Please note that the use cases for these types of clauses vary significantly. Approach drafting with caution to ensure they function effectively.

Investment treaty protections 

Investment treaties seek to promote and protect private investments made by nationals of relevant states in each other's territories. They may be bilateral (between two states, a BIT), or multilateral (between a number of states, an MIT). These treaties are usually agreed to provide confidence to foreign investors associated with a particular state (the home state) that investments will not be negatively affected by certain irregular actions by the state hosting the investment (the host state).

The Central Asian states are party to an array of BITs and MITs, such as the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), many of which provide standard protections, such as guarantees of fair and equitable treatment, full protection and security, protection from unlawful expropriation, national treatment and most favoured nation treatment. For example, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are party to more than forty BITs, whereas Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Kyrgyzstan are each party to more than twenty BITs.26 However, specific treaty wording (and other factors) will determine whether or not an investor may bring proceedings against the host state. 
 

  1. Structuring investments to benefit from particular protections offered to investors of a third state may result in the benefit of more favourable protection. 
  2. It is generally acknowledged that investors can take treaty protections into account when structuring (or re-structuring) investments, but the timing of such actions may be crucial. Past tribunals have emphasized the need to determine if a claim is an abuse of process, such as when an investor re-structures an investment solely to facilitate a claim that would otherwise not have been possible.

An epicentre of the energy transition?

Central Asia presents fascinating investment prospects. Its reserves of critical minerals and potential for renewable energy generation could enhance its appeal in the future.  However, investors should embrace responsible due diligence, meticulous contractual drafting and prudent investment structuring to mitigate inherent investment risks.


Footnotes

  1. In this article, we have considered the following Central Asian countries: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

  2. IEA (2021). The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions; page 8. Link

  3. IEA (2024). Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2024; page 53. Link.

  4. Asian Development Bank (2006). Central Asia: Increasing Gains from Trade Through Regional Cooperation in Trade Policy, Transport, and Customs Transit; e.g., see page xi. Link.

  5. United States Geological Survey (2024). Mineral Commodities Summary 2024; page 59. Link.

  6. United States Geological Survey (2024). Mineral Commodities Summary 2024; page 203. Link.

  7. United States Geological Survey (2024). Mineral Commodities Summary 2024; pages 147, 179. Link;

  8. European Commission (2023). Global Gateway Forum: EU and Uzbekistan forge strategic alliance for critical raw minerals partnership. Link.

  9. European Commission (2023). Global Gateway Forum: EU and Uzbekistan forge strategic alliance for critical raw minerals partnership. Link; United States Geological Survey (2024). Mineral Commodities Summary 2024; pages 53, 123. Link

  10. Caspian Policy Centre (2024). The C5+1 Critical Mineral Dialogue: What It Means and How We Got here. Link.

  11. Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) (2022). Advancing Energy Security in Central Asia; page 6. Link.

  12. Climate & Clean Air Coalition (CCAC) (undated). Kazakhstan webpage. Link.

  13. IEA (2022). Kazakhstan 2022 Energy Sector Review; page 14. Link.

  14. UN COP26 speech (2021), President Zhaparov. Link.

  15. EBRD (2022). EBRD In Uzbekistan Green Economy Transition. Link.

  16. EBRD (2024). EBRD to help Kazakhstan modernise and develop its mining industry. Link; EBRD (2023). Uzbekistan – Mining Sector Development Project. Link.

  17. World Bank (2023). Mining Sector Diagnostic – Kyrgyz Republic; page 27. Link.

  18. Comments made at Kazakhstan government meeting attended by President Tokayev (2021). Link.

  19. Official website of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2012). Kazakhstan-2050 Strategy. Link; Asia Pacific Energy (2013). Concept on Transition towards Green Economy until 2050. Link; Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2015). Nation's Plan – 100 Concrete Steps. Link.

  20. Comments made by President Mirziyoyev at Partnering for Green Growth and the Global Goals 2030 International Summit (2021). Link.

  21. See Lex.uz (2019). Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan On Investments and Investment Activity (2019). Link.

  22. Uzbekistan Development Strategy Centre (2022). Development Strategy of New Uzbekistan for 2022-2026. Link.   

  23. Interfax (2024). Kyrgyzstan resumes uranium extraction – law. Link.

  24. HSF (2024). An introduction to arbitration in Central Asia. Link.

  25. United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) (the New York Convention 1958).

  26. The website of the New York Convention 1958. Link.

  27. UN Trade and Development Investment Policy Hub. Link.


Key contacts

Craig Tevendale photo

Craig Tevendale

Partner, London

Craig Tevendale
Dr Patricia Nacimiento photo

Dr Patricia Nacimiento

Partner, Germany

Dr Patricia Nacimiento
Alexander Gridasov photo

Alexander Gridasov

Senior Associate, London

Alexander Gridasov
Olga Dementyeva photo

Olga Dementyeva

Senior Associate, London

Olga Dementyeva
Dr Adilbek Tussupov, LL.M. photo

Dr Adilbek Tussupov, LL.M.

Associate, Germany

Dr Adilbek Tussupov, LL.M.

Stay in the know

We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs

Asia Central Asia Group International Arbitration Geopolitics and Business Craig Tevendale Dr Patricia Nacimiento Alexander Gridasov Olga Dementyeva Dr Adilbek Tussupov, LL.M.