Banking Litigation Notes

Latest IRHP "Mis-selling judgment confirms no "mezzanine" duty of care owed by banks

Privy Council: No duty of care owed by a lender to disclose lending policies

A recent judgment handed down by the Privy Council is likely to have wide application to mis-selling claims generally: Deslauriers and another …

High Court confirms narrow application of duty established by the Court of Appeal in So v HSBC

The Court has recently revisited the question of whether a bank providing a reference owes a duty to a third party relying on that …

High Court rejects application to include conspiracy allegations in IRHP misselling claim and gives guidance on meaning of "exceptional circumstances" in past business review undertakings given to the FCA

The latest in the line of recent judgments concerning interest rate hedging product ("IRHP") misselling allegations concerns an application by the …

Court of Appeal confirms no tortious duty of care owed to customers in connection with the FCA past business review

Over the past two years, the courts have grappled with the novel claimant argument that financial institutions owe duties of care in tort …

High Court strikes out claims relating to the mis-selling of interest rate hedging products

In a recent decision, Elite Property Holdings Ltd & Anor v. Barclays Bank plc [2016] EWHC 3294 (QB), the High Court struck out the majority …