Where covertly filmed evidence would suggest to a lay person that an employee is feigning illness, employers should not take disciplinary action without first obtaining a medical opinion on whether the evidence supports this view.
A first instance tribunal ruling emphasises the risks in dismissing for malingering without good medical evidence. Although covertly filmed evidence suggested to the lay employer that an employee off work with back problems was feigning illness due to his ability to carry out many normal activities, it was unfair to dismiss for this without first obtaining a medical opinion on the evidence. A lay person is not qualified to assess the extent of the individual's injury and whether it prevents them from being at work. (Pacey v Caterpillar Logistics (UK) Ltd, ET)
Key contacts
Steve Bell
Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne
Emma Rohsler
Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.