Follow us

The EAT has confirmed that, in deciding whether it was fair to dismiss an employee for refusing to take a pay cut, the issue is whether it was reasonable for the employer to dismiss and not whether it was reasonable for the employee to accept the pay cut.  

It is not necessary for the employer to show that the survival of the business depends on the pay cut being implemented, but the "equity" of dismissing (with its implied sense of fair dealing in the circumstances) must be considered.  This may include factors such as whether the pay cut is being applied to management as well as the rest of the workforce, and the process by which the pay cut is negotiated (eg, whether the reasons used to persuade the rest of the staff to accept were legitimate). (Garside v Booth, EAT)


Article tags

Related categories

Key contacts

Samantha Brown photo

Samantha Brown

Managing Partner of EPI (West), London

Samantha Brown
Steve Bell photo

Steve Bell

Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne

Steve Bell
Emma Rohsler photo

Emma Rohsler

Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris

Emma Rohsler
Andrew Taggart photo

Andrew Taggart

Partner, London

Andrew Taggart
Fatim Jumabhoy photo

Fatim Jumabhoy

Managing Partner, Singapore, Singapore

Fatim Jumabhoy
Barbara Roth photo

Barbara Roth

Partner, New York

Barbara Roth