Follow us

Treating someone less favourably because they are married to a particular person is unlawful, according to a recent EAT decision.

The claimant alleged that she was treated less favourably because her husband was employed by the same employer and was in dispute with them. The treatment was not simply because of her status as a married person, but rather because of her relationship with a particular man. Surprisingly, the EAT was untroubled by the suggestion that she might have been treated similarly had she been in a close but unmarried relationship with the same man.

This seems to go further than previous caselaw and, unless appealed, could call into question employer policies such as prohibiting employees in close relationships working together, or refusing to employ those in a close relationship with someone working for a competitor due to the risk of disclosure of confidential information - any married employees (or employees who are registered civil partners) subjected to such policies may now be able to claim unlawful discrimination. (Dunn v The Institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management, EAT)

Key contacts

Samantha Brown photo

Samantha Brown

Managing Partner of EPI (West), London

Samantha Brown
Steve Bell photo

Steve Bell

Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne

Steve Bell
Emma Rohsler photo

Emma Rohsler

Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris

Emma Rohsler
Andrew Taggart photo

Andrew Taggart

Partner, London

Andrew Taggart
Fatim Jumabhoy photo

Fatim Jumabhoy

Managing Partner, Singapore, Singapore

Fatim Jumabhoy
Barbara Roth photo

Barbara Roth

Partner, New York

Barbara Roth