The Court of Appeal has resolved conflicting EAT decisions and ruled that a dismissal can be "transfer-connected" even if the transferor has yet to identify a likely or actual transferee.
The dismissal by an administrator of a company CEO in order to facilitate the sale of the business was transfer-connected and not for an ETO reason (economic, technical or organisational reason entailing changes to the workforce). It was not a redundancy situation, given that the business would clearly continue to need a managing director in the future. The dismissal was therefore automatically unfair and liability passed to the transferee who purchased the business one month later.
Transferees in this situation will need to try and assess whether any pre-transfer dismissals of employees can be shown to relate to the conduct of the business, or whether they may be viewed as to facilitate its sale, and factor the risk into the price offered. (Spaceright Europe v Baillavoine, CA)
Key contacts
Steve Bell
Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne
Emma Rohsler
Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.