The EAT has confirmed that, where an employer accepts the withdrawal of an employee's resignation, continuity of service is retrospectively restored. The resignation is treated as never having been effective, in the same way as a dismissal where a dismissed employee is reinstated on appeal (unless the contract provides otherwise).
As a result, the employee in this case had sufficient service to claim unfair dismissal when she resigned for a second time a few weeks later. (Chelmsford College Corporation v Teal, EAT)
Key contacts
Steve Bell
Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne
Emma Rohsler
Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.