Follow us

The EAT has ruled that employment tribunals do not have jurisdiction to apportion liability between respondents to a discrimination claim. The same would apply in relation to joint and several liability for failures to inform and consult under TUPE.

Where two or more respondents are jointly and severally liable for a compensation award, the claimant can choose against whom to enforce the award.  The EAT has ruled that an employment tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear a claim under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 for the other respondent to contribute.  More worryingly, the EAT also considered (obiter) that the civil courts' powers to apportion liability under the 1978 Act do not apply to employment tribunal claims either, leaving co-respondents with no route to claim a contribution.  (Brennan v Sunderland City Council, EAT)

Key contacts

Samantha Brown photo

Samantha Brown

Managing Partner of EPI (West), London

Samantha Brown
Steve Bell photo

Steve Bell

Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne

Steve Bell
Emma Rohsler photo

Emma Rohsler

Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris

Emma Rohsler
Andrew Taggart photo

Andrew Taggart

Partner, London

Andrew Taggart
Fatim Jumabhoy photo

Fatim Jumabhoy

Managing Partner, Singapore, Singapore

Fatim Jumabhoy
Barbara Roth photo

Barbara Roth

Partner, New York

Barbara Roth