Follow us

Employers may need to consider paying for an employee with work-related stress and depression to have private psychiatric counselling and cognitive behavioural therapy recommended by a clinical psychiatrist.

The EAT in Croft Vets Ltd v Butcher considered that it was a reasonable adjustment to pay for such a specific form of support in the workplace to help the employee return to work and cope with her work-related difficulties, in a situation where the condition was largely caused by work. There was no evidence that the treatment would have been available on the NHS in the appropriate timescale.

The EAT made clear that this was not imposing an obligation on employers to pay for medical treatment to improve a disabled employee's health generally. There will only be an obligation if recommended therapy is work-related and aimed at assisting an employee with stress/depression cope at work. Presumably the issue of whether the condition was caused by work may influence both (i) the type of treatment recommended and whether this is sufficiently work-related and (ii) whether it is reasonable for the employer to pick up the tab. The availability of free treatment ought also to be relevant.

 

Key contacts

Samantha Brown photo

Samantha Brown

Managing Partner of EPI (West), London

Samantha Brown
Steve Bell photo

Steve Bell

Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne

Steve Bell
Emma Rohsler photo

Emma Rohsler

Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris

Emma Rohsler
Andrew Taggart photo

Andrew Taggart

Partner, London

Andrew Taggart
Fatim Jumabhoy photo

Fatim Jumabhoy

Managing Partner, Singapore, Singapore

Fatim Jumabhoy
Barbara Roth photo

Barbara Roth

Partner, New York

Barbara Roth