An employer could be vicariously liable under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 for harm caused by an employee harassing a colleague, including harm foreseeably and directly caused to another person; this could be a spouse living at the same address and caused alarm by the employee's behaviour at that address. The Court of Appeal has ruled for the first time that an indirect victim of harassment may be able to claim damages under the 1997 Act. (Levi v Bates)
Key contacts
Steve Bell
Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne
Emma Rohsler
Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.