The Supreme Court in Taiwo v Olaigbe and Onu v Akwiwu has ruled that less favourable treatment due to a vulnerable immigration status was not direct race discrimination; immigration status is not expressly a protected characteristic and cannot be equated with nationality (which is a protected characteristic).
In some cases the treatment might involve application of a practice, condition or policy (a 'PCP'), in which case an indirect race discrimination might be possible. However, this case involved the abuse of two migrant domestic workers and it was not possible to discern a PCP.
Lady Hale did comment that Parliament might wish to consider providing employment tribunals with the power to award compensation for victims of modern slavery who are mistreated in this way.
Key contacts
Steve Bell
Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne
Emma Rohsler
Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.