Employers should review their working arrangements to ensure they allow workers to take their statutory rest breaks.
Rejecting earlier conflicting EAT authority, the EAT in Grange v Abellio took a purposive approach to the Working Time Regulations in ruling that a worker can bring a claim for denial of their right to a rest break, despite the worker not having made an explicit request for a break which was refused, if the arrangements in effect prevent the worker from exercising their entitlement. This can be contrasted with the position where the worker is able to take a break but chooses not to for their own reasons – employers are not required to force an employee to take a break.
Key contacts
Steve Bell
Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne
Emma Rohsler
Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.