Follow us

Employers will welcome the High Court's decision in Steel v Spencer Road LLP (trading as The Omerta Group) upholding as enforceable a contractual requirement for an employee to repay a discretionary bonus if they gave or were given notice of termination within three months of payment

The Court declined to depart from established caselaw and rejected an argument that the clawback provisions operated as an unenforceable restraint of trade and penalty clause.  The clause did operate as a disincentive to resigning, but it did not impose any restrictions on where the employee could work after resigning and was not disproportionateThe analysis of the clawback provision was not affected by the impact of other contractual provisions such as the length of notice required or post-termination restrictive covenants.   

In contrast, clawback provisions which operate if an employee starts work at a competitor within a specified period could potentially be an unenforceable restraint of trade.

Key contacts

Samantha Brown photo

Samantha Brown

Managing Partner of EPI (West), London

Samantha Brown
Steve Bell photo

Steve Bell

Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne

Steve Bell
Emma Rohsler photo

Emma Rohsler

Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris

Emma Rohsler
Andrew Taggart photo

Andrew Taggart

Partner, London

Andrew Taggart
Fatim Jumabhoy photo

Fatim Jumabhoy

Managing Partner, Singapore, Singapore

Fatim Jumabhoy
Barbara Roth photo

Barbara Roth

Partner, New York

Barbara Roth