Employers will welcome the High Court's decision in Steel v Spencer Road LLP (trading as The Omerta Group) upholding as enforceable a contractual requirement for an employee to repay a discretionary bonus if they gave or were given notice of termination within three months of payment.
The Court declined to depart from established caselaw and rejected an argument that the clawback provisions operated as an unenforceable restraint of trade and penalty clause. The clause did operate as a disincentive to resigning, but it did not impose any restrictions on where the employee could work after resigning and was not disproportionate. The analysis of the clawback provision was not affected by the impact of other contractual provisions such as the length of notice required or post-termination restrictive covenants.
In contrast, clawback provisions which operate if an employee starts work at a competitor within a specified period could potentially be an unenforceable restraint of trade.
Key contacts
Steve Bell
Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne
Emma Rohsler
Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.