Asia's diverse landscape, with its unique retirement-related obligations in each jurisdiction, poses challenges in formulating a harmonised retirement policy. This article explores the statutory retirement ages and re-employment obligations across Asia, offering a guide to understanding the intricacies of the region's retirement landscape.
Questions | Singapore | PRC | Japan | Hong Kong | South Korea | Taiwan |
Is there a statutory minimum retirement age? | Yes.
The current minimum statutory retirement age is 63 years. There is a prohibition against terminating an eligible employee's employment on the ground of age before the employee reaches 63 years. An employee would be considered to be eligible for the protection against dismissal on the grounds of age if they, amongst others, are a Singapore citizen or Singapore permanent resident and have commenced their employment before age 55. Beyond that, there are also obligations to re-employ eligible employees up to the age of 68 (see below). An employee would be considered to be eligible for re-employment if they, amongst others, are a Singapore citizen or Singapore permanent resident, have been in employment with the employer for at least 2 years before turning 63 if they have been hired at age 55 and above, have satisfactory work performance, as assessed by the employer and are medically fit to continue working. |
Yes.
The current statutory retirement age is 50 or 55 years (for employees in technical or managerial position) for women and 60 years for men. Employment ends upon an employee reaching the statutory retirement age. |
Yes.
The current minimum statutory retirement age is 60 years. Employers may stipulate a retirement age (usually in the work rules) of 60 or higher. However, to ensure stable employment up to the age of 65, employers who stipulate a retirement age are required to increase their retirement age up to 65, abolish their established retirement age or re-employ employees up to the age of 65. Additionally, employers who have set the retirement age at 65 or more but less than 70 or who have introduced a system of continuous employment up to the age of 65 (excluding a system of continued employment until they are 70 or more), are required to make best efforts to take one of the following measures:
However, for 4 and 5, the employer will have to obtain the consent of the labour union who has more than half of the employees in the workplace as members (or if there is no such labour union, then with an employee representative who represents the majority of employees in a workplace).
|
No. | Yes.
The current minimum statutory retirement age is 60 years, but there are proposals to increase it. Employers may stipulate a retirement age (usually in the work rules) of 60 or higher. An employee's employment may be terminated on the grounds of retirement once they hit 60 if a retirement age of 60 is stipulated. |
Yes.
The current minimum statutory retirement age is 65 years. Employers may stipulate a retirement age (usually in the work rules) of 65 or higher. An employee's employment may be terminated on the grounds of retirement once they hit 65 if a retirement age of 65 is stipulated. However, an employer may request to reduce the minimum statutory mandatory retirement age in certain circumstances. |
Is there a statutory obligation to re-employ employees after they reach retirement age? | Yes.
Employers must offer re-employment to eligible employees who turn 63, up to the age of 68. If an employee is eligible for re-employment but the employer is unable to offer them a position, then an employer must:
|
No.
|
Re-employment up to the age of 65 is one of the ways to comply with the obligation to ensure stable employment up until the age of 65. | No. | No.
|
No.
|
Herbert Smith Freehills LLP provides access to Singapore law advice through our Formal Law Alliance with Prolegis LLC.
Key contacts

Steve Bell
Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne

Emma Rohsler
Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris
Disclaimer
Herbert Smith Freehills LLP has a Formal Law Alliance (FLA) with Singapore law firm Prolegis LLC, which provides clients with access to Singapore law advice from Prolegis. The FLA in the name of Herbert Smith Freehills Prolegis allows the two firms to deliver a complementary and seamless legal service.