Stay in the know
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs
Explore our report
Australian companies are more profoundly aware of their corporate responsibilities and reputation than ever before. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations continue to increase in importance as part of the equation when making investment decisions. In part, this reflects growing expectations from customers, employees and shareholders, but also the rising tide of domestic and international regulation, and other external vectors.
Embracing ESG in a measured, practical and authentic way can help businesses tap into aligned investors, elevate their employee value proposition and reposition brands. There is an appetite among many Australian companies to be ambitious in setting their strategy and targets around material ESG issues. However, it is tempered by the complexity of the regulatory landscape and the risks (real and perceived) associated with aiming too high and falling short. Failure to properly take account of ESG-related risks, or misrepresenting a company’s ESG credentials, can cause reputational damage and leave companies and boards vulnerable to adverse action and, in some cases, litigation.
In early 2024, we conducted our second major ESG survey to gauge how businesses are grappling with the rapidly changing ESG landscape. We wanted to explore the different dimensions of an area sometimes perceived as amorphous, as well as to re-test business sentiment following years of geopolitical, economic and climate-related disruption.
Our survey this year coincided with a period of substantial ESG-related regulatory shifts in Australia. Climate-related concerns still top the issues that companies identify as being the subject of ESG reviews by a significant margin, however it is notable that 'S' issues have gained prominence. Legislative reforms addressing sexual harassment and psychological safety in the workplace have been introduced, alongside mandatory gender pay gap reporting. The ASX’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations also necessitate certain 'S' disclosures, with further revisions concerning stakeholder interests and diversity objectives under consultation. Beyond the workplace, the Modern Slavery Act 2018, post-review, received 30 reform suggestions, including the introduction of due diligence requirements. Conversations around Aboriginal and cultural heritage, social licence, and the value of a just transition are also intensifying.
It’s a much more complex world in 2024 and that’s what we wanted to draw out, says Herbert Smith Freehills Environment, Planning and Communities Partner Melanie Debenham. “That is not to say that ‘E’ issues – and particularly climate change – have been left behind,” she adds. Notably, a Bill to implement mandatory climate-related financial disclosure was introduced in the Australian Parliament in March 2024. While the current focus of this legislation is on climate reporting, other topics under the environmental sustainability umbrella are not far away. This aligns with the recent broader reform agenda for key environmental laws in Australia.
“There’s been a huge amount of regulation across the board. The law is requiring companies to do more and to put in place the frameworks for managing a broad range of environmental and social issues,” says Herbert Smith Freehills Partner and ESG Lead, Australia Timothy Stutt.
The ‘G’ is the common thread that weaves through all the ‘E’ and ‘S’ issues, adds Herbert Smith Freehills Partner Carolyn Pugsley, who specialises in corporate governance and board advisory. “Boards and management teams are looking for guidance, not just on the content of new regulation, but on how to bring it to life within their organisations. Issues of accountability, resourcing, information flows and integration of ESG issues into organisational decision-making are cropping up across all the ‘hot button’ areas, including climate change, human rights and cyber.”
This report highlights the main findings from our survey of 161 business leaders, including C-suite executives, board directors, company secretaries, general counsel and senior management. It combines survey data from business leaders with insights from our ESG lawyers, to give shape to the challenges and opportunities Australian businesses face amidst escalating ESG regulations and stakeholder expectations. The landscape is constantly shifting. While businesses have been grappling with ‘E’ and climate change issues for some time now, the ‘S’ in ESG is increasingly becoming a focus and, with it, evolving ways of understanding and managing risk, opportunity and impact.
Tim Stutt and Mel Debenham discuss the findings of our second major survey on the barriers to deploying investment in ESG-aligned activities, and the progress in operationalising ESG considerations across business activities. ESG remains a clear focus in investment decisions, although there remain challenges in deploying capital such as lack of financial return, proven technologies and access to capital.
The contents of this publication are for reference purposes only and may not be current as at the date of accessing this publication. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action based on this publication.
© Herbert Smith Freehills 2024
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs