The UK's need for new or refurbished developments across various real estate asset classes, and for additional or upgraded energy and other infrastructure, is well-rehearsed. But pulling together the construction delivery contracts may need some script adjustments. Challenges confronting the market are well-documented, with the collapse of ISG re-emphasising the dangers to supply chain and clients when things go wrong. As the supply chain is increasingly careful about risks taken-on, clients, consultants, suppliers, contractors and all project stakeholders are going to need to be adaptable in order to settle contracts on mutually acceptable terms without jeopardising appraisals. Genuine investment in relationships could be key.
In the real estate sector, with clear water between initial cost plans and tender returns, main contractor’s risk pricing conventionally representing sunk cost whether or not risks materialise, and time/cost certainty to some extent illusory in a market where main contractors are looking to take reduced risk, market conditions may create an environment in some quarters for management contracting to regain traction.
As the energy transition gathers momentum, with continually evolving technology and innovation, procurement strategies and contracts will need a keen eye for optimisation to deal with specific or complex risks and working environments. Contracts will need to support delivery of pricing and programme efficiencies, strike the right balance between risk and value for money and, for procuring clients, be sufficiently market-facing for competent/specialist suppliers/contractors increasingly in demand.