Follow us


"While the world is now moving rapidly towards battery power and storage, China is light years ahead of everyone," reflects Hong Kong-based energy and infrastructure associate Charles Wong. "Not just on the technology but the entire supply chain, from minerals, chemicals and refining to equipment, scientific know-how and the skilled labour to make it run."

It's an assessment recognised by global lawmakers. National sensitivities reflect the reality that the battery value chain is complex and domination by one nation across its links creates political and commercial challenges. Moreover, critical minerals such as lithium, nickel and cobalt play a central role in the energy transition in general and in particular the manufacture of lynchpin technologies like grid-scale energy storage and electric vehicle (EV) batteries. Nations increasingly focused on energy security are determined to ensure reliable access to such raw materials and the processing and supply chain expertise needed to put them to use.

This scramble for resources has already triggered huge increases in demand. The International Energy Agency (IEA) reckons lithium production will need to increase by an eye-watering 600% by 2030 to be on course to hit net zero targets for 2050, by which time there needs to be a 40% increase in cobalt supplies. The IEA also forecasts that investment in key metals in the energy transition, including nickel and copper, would need to be in the region of $360 billion to $450 billion by 2030 to be on course for key 2050 climate targets.

But current data lays bare the extent of the industry concentration. According to the IEA, over half of global raw material processing for lithium, cobalt and natural graphite occurs in China; indeed, with 90% of graphite mining occurring within its borders, China dominates the graphite anode supply chain. China also possesses 85% of global battery cell manufacturing capacity and accounts for 90% of cathode and 98% of anode active material global manufacturing. The numbers dwarf Europe's share, which stands at 7% of battery cell manufacturing capacity, largely in Poland and Hungary, and 10% of cobalt processing, which mostly takes place in Finland. Crucially, China has also established an expertise ecosystem, meaning some countries rich in natural resources still need to ship those commodities to China for processing.

China shaped its industrial policy almost 20 years ago to own this critical supply chain. In the early days, a lot of companies went under but now that strategy has paid off.

Calvin Ho
Partner, Herbert Smith Freehills

"China shaped its industrial policy almost 20 years ago in order to own this critical supply chain," notes Calvin Ho, an energy partner in Herbert Smith Freehills' (HSF) Beijing office. "This included tax breaks to encourage capital to move into this area. In the early days, a lot of companies went under in that smaller, emerging market, but now that strategy has paid off."

Other countries have not been idle. Australia's Critical Minerals Strategy builds on the country's favourable geology, which makes it the world's largest producer of raw lithium products such as spodumene. Australia's National Battery Strategy, announced this year, includes A$523.2 million to strengthen economic resilience and battery manufacturing, plus another A$7 billion in support for Australian critical minerals processing over the next decade. The argument goes that access to such raw materials is paramount, as refining capacity can come later while partnerships with like-minded countries can diversify the supply chain – something the EU has sought with its own Critical Raw Minerals Act. The EU act also includes a series of targets, including ensuring that 10% of the EU's annual critical minerals consumption is extracted within the bloc and 40% is refined within its borders, reflecting a wider global drive to bring extraction and processing closer to home.

"Without that raw material you can't produce anything else," says Jay Leary, Perth-based energy, resources and infrastructure partner and head of mining at Herbert Smith Freehills. "The real concern of vehicle manufacturers, for example, is getting access to the raw product – spodumene or lithium brine. If you don't have access to that then your supply chain is very uncertain. Most lithium projects will start as a lithium mine and in the future, once they've developed revenue, look to develop a processing plant." Leary notes the development of Australia and Chile as leading global producers of raw lithium products, alongside rapid growth in Canada, and forecasts that Europe will be a significant lithium producer within 10 years.

Other notable state interventions include the Inflation Reduction Act in the US, the Biden administration's flagship industrial and climate initiative, a $400 billion policy designed to propel domestic cleantech and entrench energy resilience, and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. And Japan – where today's lithium-ion batteries were first invented in the mid 1980s – announced its own battery strategy in 2022 to recapture market advantage and boost production capacity in both current and emerging battery technology. The UK announced its first critical minerals strategy in July 2022, though there will be much focus now on how the new Labour administration tackles the area amid a stated priority to speed up the nation's shift to clean energy.

The real concern of vehicle manufacturers is getting access to the raw product – spodumene or lithium brine. If you don't have access to that then your supply chain is very uncertain.

Jay Leary
Partner, Herbert Smith Freehills

Meanwhile, investments from EV manufacturers are forecast to have a relatively even geographic distribution, according to market intelligence provider Atlas Public Policy, which puts the total committed investment by automakers and battery manufacturers at $1.2 trillion. Of this, the US is set to receive $312 billion, Europe $346 billion and China $243 billion.

Game-changers – What are the alternatives to lithium-ion batteries?

Some emerging trends may also begin to distribute battery production more globally, in particular the development of alternate battery chemicals, such as sodium-ion units. Sodium is one of the most common elements on earth and, unlike lithium-based counterparts, can use aluminium anode current collectors, reducing the need for copper, cobalt and nickel. While China has also taken a lead in sodium-ion battery development, a more readily obtainable chemistry means other economies would have an easier time catching up, making their lower energy density potentially a reasonable trade-off. Commercially viable solid-state batteries – a safer and potentially more powerful model – could similarly prove a game-changer. Meanwhile, with planning in Europe for around 30 gigafactories – a loose term for large manufacturing hubs that make battery units or related decarbonisation technologies – the region is becoming one of the fastest growing in the world for the manufacturing of EV batteries outside of China. Japan and South Korea are also regarded as key emerging manufacturing hubs.

Of course, introducing new battery models into a large and expanding markets create challenges. For carmakers, who are committed to multi-year production lines, a shift towards sodium-ion or solid-state batteries could prove disruptive. Meanwhile, original equipment manufacturers (OEM) are central to the dilemma, both spearheading research and development and assessing the risks posed by widespread new battery units to long-term investment and procurement strategies.

For a gigafactory project, a major difficulty is you need a long-term business case for equity and debt investors. It's hard to see what the revenue is like after a seven-year period because you have a contract to produce a specific battery for a car model and you need your OEM signing up for a long-term offtake of batteries.

Helen Beatty
Partner, Herbert Smith Freehills

Such uncertainties contribute to conservatism among lenders and investors about backing major projects. Helen Beatty, London-based finance and projects partner, comments: "For a gigafactory project, a major difficulty is you need a long-term business case for equity and debt investors. However, it's hard to see what the revenue is like after a seven-year period because you have a contract to produce a specific battery for a car model and you need your OEM signing up for a long-term offtake of batteries; but there is huge uncertainty about what battery model is mainstream after that period. Every time you change the technology, you have to do a review of the risk factors."

Business is also contending with increased regulation as energy resilience and environmental, social and governance (ESG) scrutiny increases, particularly in Europe following the EU Batteries Regulation, which came into force in August 2023 and will be continually implemented in phases. Among the measures was the requirement of a 'battery passport' designed to bring greater transparency to the battery supply chain and boost recycling. Meanwhile, the EU's Corporate Sustainability and Due Diligence Directive will also compel businesses to focus on the providence of their products and carry out related risk-based due diligence to address a wider range of environmental and human rights risks in their supply chain.

Such concepts are emblematic of a global economy jostling for position. But the painful reality for nations hoping to build local production is that more robust state support will be required if they are to entice significantly more private sector backers required to scale up production in the next five-to-10 years. Such challenges were illustrated in September when Swedish battery maker Northvolt announced it was to cut 1,600 jobs citing uncertainties in the EV market. For a firm often held up as a regional champion, it was a stark illustration of the hurdles in building out Europe's battery supply chain. A test of commitment looms in some markets. "There is now a deeper understanding of the importance of batteries at national government levels," concludes Ho. "That will mean heightened scrutiny of supply chain investment as each new technology emerges."
 

Related blog: Everything you need to know about Australia's 2023 Critical Minerals Strategy


Chasing Zero – Energy Transition

Sign up to receive updates on this series

Key contacts

Charles Wong photo

Charles Wong

Senior Associate, Hong Kong

Charles Wong
Calvin Ho photo

Calvin Ho

Partner, Mainland China

Calvin Ho
Helen Beatty photo

Helen Beatty

Partner, London

Helen Beatty

Stay in the know

We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs

London Riyadh New York Paris Tokyo Sydney Singapore Perth Mainland China Brisbane Hong Kong Melbourne Madrid Dubai Johannesburg Australia Bangkok India Group Jakarta Germany Brussels Milan Climate Change ESG, Sustainability and Responsible Business Mining Energy Power Renewables Infrastructure Energy Transition and Net Zero ESG Geopolitics and Business Charles Wong Calvin Ho Jay Leary Helen Beatty