Stay in the know
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs
Italy currently has no dedicated artificial intelligence regulation. Instead, it adheres to existing European legislation, such as the EU AI Act. However, Italian regulators such as Garante, AGCOM, and the ACN are actively shaping AI guidance and oversight. Italy is also working towards regulating AI through a proposed national law that will implement specific EU AI Act provisions, but also likely set out additional rules. As a civil law country, court rulings do not set binding precedents, but both the Supreme Court and regulatory bodies like the Garante have already considered AI-related legal matters, signalling growing judicial and regulatory engagement with the technology.
Italy's strategy places significant importance on AI. To support and guide the government in the definition of national legislation and policies on AI, a committee of experts developed the "Italian Strategy for Artificial Intelligence 2024-2026". It outlines sector-specific frameworks for regulating AI, with a focus on:
There is no specific AI regulation currently as Italy implements the EU AI Act (read our guide on AI and EU here), effective from 1 August 2024, which establishes a comprehensive legal framework for AI across all EU member states.
However, the country is working on its own AI Bill, aimed at establishing a national regulatory framework which focuses on five key areas:
The proposed law introduces specific requirements for AI-generated content and copyright protection, including:
Despite its ambitions, the AI Bill is currently stalled before the Italian Parliament, primarily due to its economic implications (requiring further review by the Budget Committee) and the European Commission's objections, which stress the need for the Bill to align with the EU AI Act and avoid imposing unnecessary national restrictions beyond the EU framework.
From consumer protection law to online safety, AI continues to stretch existing legal frameworks. See the latest updates below.
Explore the latest landmark rulings as AI-related disputes make their way through the courts.
Italian Supreme Court, Decision No. 1107 of 9 January 2023. According to the Supreme Court, the unauthorised reproduction of a creative image of a flower constitutes a copyright infringement against the creator of the image, even if AI is involved in the creative process. The use of AI to produce a work of art does not automatically disqualify a work from copyright protection for not being original. However, if an AI system fully replaces human creative input, the final output may not be considered an original work and therefore would not qualify for copyright protection.
Garante v. ChatGPT - OpenAI, Decision No. 755 of 2 November 2024. The Garante found that OpenAI failed to notify the Authority about a data breach in March 2023 and processed users' personal data to train ChatGPT without establishing a proper legal basis. Additionally, the company violated transparency requirements by not providing adequate information to users and did not implement age verification mechanisms, exposing children under 13 to potentially inappropriate responses given their level of development and self-awareness. As a result, OpenAI was sanctioned, ordered to conduct a six-month public awareness campaign, and fined €15 million.
The contents of this publication are for reference purposes only and may not be current as at the date of accessing this publication. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action based on this publication.
© Herbert Smith Freehills 2025
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs