The fact that an employee working overseas is on an employment contract governed by English law is a relevant factor in determining whether he can bring an unfair dismissal claim in England, even if it was simply a standard contract drafted for employees working in England and was used for the claimant simply for convenience. The tribunal's failure to take this into account in relation to an employee working in Saudi Arabia in Green v Sig Trading Limited led to the EAT remitting the case for reconsideration.
However, it ruled that the tribunal had been entitled to ignore the fact that the claimant's redundancy had been handled from the UK, given that this was simply a pragmatic arrangement in view of the lack of HR support overseas, and therefore said little about the connection between the claimant's employment and Great Britain. The case highlights the risks for UK businesses using standard contracts for overseas employees.
Key contacts
Steve Bell
Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne
Emma Rohsler
Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.