The Court of Appeal has ruled on the territorial scope of the duty to inform and consult on collective redundancies at an establishment. The duty applies where the relevant establishment has a sufficiently close connection with Great Britain, and not simply where the employees have sufficient connection. In this case the Court considered that the ships of a fleet operating mostly outside UK territorial waters were each a single establishment (such that the duty would apply only if 20 redundancies were proposed on one ship) and the fact that some administrative functions were performed in Surrey was insufficient connection for the duty to apply. (Seahorse Maritime Limited v Nautilus International)
Key contacts
Steve Bell
Managing Partner - Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety (Australia, Asia), Melbourne
Emma Rohsler
Regional Head of Practice (EMEA) - Employment Pensions and Incentives, Paris
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.