Stay in the know
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs
As part of Ofcom's phased approach and accompanying roadmap to implementation of the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA), the duties relating to illegal content and associated harms are being prioritised as part of Phase 1.
In this second chapter of our 'Your questions answered' series relating to the OSA we take a look at:
For the purposes of this chapter and the remaining chapters in this series, we have used the term 'regulated provider' to refer collectively to all online service providers within the scope of the OSA. See Chapter 1 for more information on which online services are caught by the OSA.
The information set out in this Chapter 2 is primarily based on the OSA together with the draft Illegal Content Codes of Practice and accompanying guidance published on 9 November 2023 as part of Ofcom's consultation on 'Protecting people from illegal harms online' (referred to in the remainder of this chapter as the 'illegal harms consultation').
At the time of writing, Ofcom was expecting to finalise the Illegal Content Codes of Practice during Q4 of 2024 with a view to the codes coming into force by the end of Q1 2025. It remains to be seen whether these timelines will slip given the change of government over the summer.
The term 'illegal content' is defined under section 59 of the OSA.
Content (including words, images, speech or sounds) will constitute 'illegal content' if the use, possession, viewing, accessing, publication or dissemination of such content constitutes a 'relevant offence'.
The short answer is that (for the purposes of compliance with the OSA) regulated providers are responsible for making these decisions, however both the OSA and Ofcom provide further guidance on how regulated providers should approach these decisions (referred to as 'illegal content judgments' in the Ofcom guidance).
In summary, where a regulated provider finds itself having to make a judgment (for the purposes of compliance with the OSA) as to whether content is illegal content, the content should be considered illegal content if the service has 'reasonable grounds to infer', based on 'all relevant information that is reasonably available' to the service, that the content constitutes one or more relevant offences as referred to above.
The OSA further clarifies that such 'reasonable grounds' will exist where the service:
Detailed draft guidance on how regulated providers should approach illegal content judgments can be found in Ofcom's Illegal Content Judgments Guidance.
The duties under the OSA relating to illegal content can be broken down into 6 key categories:
Note that the OSA addresses duties for user-to-user (u2u) services separately from search services, however the duties are broadly similar, so we have combined them for the purposes of the below summary (but have included the relevant u2u and search section references for further detail).
The concept of proportionality (taking into account the size and capacity of the regulated provider) is found throughout the OSA (in particular when it comes to the safety duties referred to above – see for example s10(10) and s27(10)).
In addition, Ofcom has made clear in its draft guidance that it will adapt its expectations in relation to compliance with the OSA and Ofcom's Codes of Practice depending on the type of service it is dealing with and will not expect the same of a small low-risk service as it does of the largest or riskiest services.
In light of this approach, Ofcom has created certain sub-categories of services according to their size and risk, which it refers to throughout the illegal harms consultation and its draft illegal content Codes of Practice, as follows:
*The definitions of multi-risk and large services are contained in section A.11 (Definitions and interpretation) of Ofcom's draft illegal content Codes of Practice for u2u services (and A.8 of the draft illegal content Codes of Practice for search services).
Note that Ofcom's proposed definition of large services is intended to closely mirror the definition of large services adopted by the EU in the Digital Services Act, in the hope of reducing the burden of regulatory compliance across different regimes.
Many of the more onerous measures proposed in Ofcom's illegal content Codes of Practice (for example, use of automated 'hash matching' to detect CSAM, board-level annual risk assessments and the implementation of performance targets for determining complaints) are proposed only to apply to large or multi-risk services.
Even with this proportionate approach, there will still be challenges (especially for smaller regulated providers), and Ofcom has explicitly recognised this in the illegal harms consultation. Nevertheless, Ofcom considers that the cumulative impact of the proposals set out in the consultation is proportionate.
The contents of this publication are for reference purposes only and may not be current as at the date of accessing this publication. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action based on this publication.
© Herbert Smith Freehills 2024
We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs